Monday, September 14, 2020

I admit to cheating.

I've mentioned a few times that I've had to draw all the parts for my PSG-None from scratch.  So, how do I do that and get reasonably accurate parts without having any actual PSG-1 parts to measure?  Simple, I cheat.  Solidworks has a feature that allows you to import a picture as a sketch, the Sketch Picture command.  What I do is find the most direct side shot of the object that I want to copy, import it into Solidworks, then scale it to the appropriate size.  For this project, I used the two rear takedown pin holes as my scaling guide, because I can directly measure the distance between those holes on the parts I have.  I just made a sketch with some points the correct distance apart, and scaled the image so it matched.

Then it's just a matter of creating 3D objects using the 2D picture as a guide.  Something to watch out for is if the object in the picture is tipped or has some lens distortion.  In this case, the gun in the picture was photographed at a slightly upward angle instead of a direct side shot, so the stock especially has some noticeable distortion because it's tall and straight.  You have to account for that in your sketching, and fudge as necessary.  Here's what my new parts look like overlaid on the picture I used as a guide.


I tried to be as accurate as I could, but still had to use some artistic license because I don't have real parts to measure.  I spent hours scouring the internet for reference photos and did the best I could without having parts in hand, and they look nice but these are in no way interchangeable with real PSG-1 parts(nor are they really intended to be, if you want a real clone buy real parts).  I also had to make some changes to work with my CETME parts kit, most notably in the handguard so that it would fit with the CETME trunion and cocking tube.  I took a lot of liberties on that one...  Here are what the parts look like without the guide picture in the way.  Just have to print them out and then wait until I get the receiver together to see how they fit.



Something old and something new

It's been cold and rainy and I didn't want to go outside so I got some more work done on the PSG-None.  When I stared this project, I though it would be pretty straight forward because I'd already 3D printed a cosplay prop version of the PSG-1.  Yeah...not so much.  The file that I based my prop on was not even close to accurate, none of it was the right shape and it wasn't even close to something that would fit on a real receiver.  Good enough for what it was as a prop, but not good enough for me to want to use on this project.  So I ended up redrawing everything from scratch.  

I started with the pistol grip since it could be printed quickly for test fitting. While I was at it, I experimented with Cura's "Fuzzy Skin" option.  It's an option in Cure that makes the outer wall of the print jitter randomly, making it look fuzzy compared to the smooth lines of a standard print.  You can see in the picture where the fuzzy skin stops and standard skin starts.  At some point I'll post a how-to for getting the fuzzy skin only in areas where you want it.  Here are my first test pieces, the grip and palm shelf, on my CETME grip housing.  This is basically a rough draft, the final version will fit a little better, and will be a bit shorter.  The bottom of the grip on this print extends too far down.  Also, for what it's worth, I usually use grey for all my prototyping because it's easy to see where things are rubbing and material has to be removed to get things to fit right(just a handy tip for printing things you know you're going to have to file and fit).

After modifying the grip to my satisfaction, I moved onto the stock.  Here too, I drew everything from scratch.  I'm going to be using a G3 recoil assembly and buffer instead of the CETME parts.  I bought a whole recoil/stock unit because it was actually cheaper than just buying the recoil assembly alone, so I have a nice surplus green G3 stock to pull some measurements from too.  After drafting, I printed out the front chunk of stock to make sure it fit in the recoil assembly like it was supposed to.  It needed just a little tweaking to fit right, and after seeing the print I changed the shape of the front few inches to better match the real thing too, so the final part will look better than this first print.




Monday, September 7, 2020

Two birds, one stone...maybe...

Like many of the guns I've built so far,  CETMEs use a receiver flat that gets folded into a receiver shell.  I'm going to make my own bending jig because I can.  A problem with these flats is getting them folded straight and to the right size.  Instead of making a bending jig and a separate straightening mandrel, I'm going to try to do it all at once.  I'm going to use a 3D printed jig mostly to see how it works.  Instead of just a round rod in the center, I drew up a mandrel to match the contours of the inside of the receiver.  Hopefully it will keep things straight and symmetrical.  Since I have a large piece of G3 receiver left over, I decided to flatten it out and test my jig idea with it.  I printed out a 3" piece of jig for the test.  Here's how it looks before bending:

And after bending.  The jig pieces aren't even printed solid, it's only 8 walls and 25% infill, and it bent this chunk of receiver without breaking a sweat.  Just out of curiosity I kept pressing until I crushed the upper mandrel, and it took a lot more force to crush the jig than it did to bend the receiver chunk.  I have to do a little bit of tweaking on the mandrel shape, but so far it really shows promise.
When I tried my "crush to destruction" test, the lower jig didn't even flex.  There's a lot of contact surface area where the receiver is pushing down on it and the base is wider than the top to help keep the sides from flexing out.  The upper mandrel stayed pretty intact too, it crushed directly under where the pressure  from the press was applied.  Keep in mind that this wasn't printed solid either, just 8 walls and 25% infill too.  Here's the upper mandrel post-destructive test.  It didn't even really crack and there is no layer separation, it just kind of smooshed until the plastic tore. 


Seperation anxiety

Like many military guns of the post-war era, CETME rifles consist of a few hard parts in a sheetmetal receiver shell.  Since I need to reuse the parts, I need to liberate them from the receiver pieces included in the kit, and that's part of why I've put this project off as long as I have.  The most common method is to grind the spot welds thin then peel the sheetmetal off.  I started with the front trunion because it's the biggest/easiest piece.  I didn't even need to grind through the welds.  It looks like some of them were already broke and had been for a while, and the ones that weren't were pretty weak.  This should have been the most solidly mounted part of the whole receiver.  When you hear people say to be wary of the quality of Spanish guns, this is why...

The rest of the parts were, in fact, properly welded.  When buying the parts I needed I also bought a G3 rear receiver section to harvest the rear sight base and stock attachment weldment(though I won't be using the iron sights at all on this build it was cheaper this way).  Here are all the parts I scavenged along with what's left of the receiver pieces:



Always start with the legal stuff

As with all the other parts kits I've built, this CETME kit was once a select fire rifle.  Because of that, the first thing I'm going to do is mod the fire control group so that it will only function as a semi-auto.  The CETME fire control system is similar to, but completely different from the G3 trigger pack so no individual parts interchange.  The CETME is so close to it's G3 cousin that a whole genuine PSG-1 grip assembly would fit on this build with no fuss, but just the grip/fire control assembly alone is literally 8x the cost of the CETME parts kit.  Semi-auto G3 parts are available, but no such luck with the CETME so the original parts need to be modified.  There are several guides available on the internet, so I won't bother going through every step.  

On G3 style rifles, leaving the front grip housing pin in place makes your receiver qualify as a machine gun, so it can't used.  Conveniently, the real PSG-1 lower doesn't use the front pin either so I would have eliminated it anyway.  The first thing I did was whack the ears off the grip housing.


Then I took the whole thing apart and modified the internal parts.  Most of the pieces needed a little bit trimmed off, and the fire control cage needed a corner cut off and a shelf welded in it's place.  Here are the bits after being modified:

While I was at it, I crushed the auto-sear in my vice.  Here's what's left of the auto-sear along with all the other naughty bits that got cut off:

With all the parts trimmed, the trigger pack can go back together.  The selector is still a 3 position selector, but it now goes Semi-Safe-Semi.  Once I know everything works, I'll cold blue all the parts.



New project time: The PSG-None, a CETME based PSG-1 look-alike

This whole project is going to be an exercise in "Fake it 'till you make it."  A while ago I made a 3D printed H&K PSG-1 costume prop for a friend.   Researching for that project got me interested in the PSG-1 it's self.  It's a sharpshooter rifle based on the H&K G3 and was modified for extreme accuracy.  Real PSG-1s, if you can even find one for sale, are ridiculously expensive.  And not just "Jeff is being cheap" expensive, but "sell half your possessions" expensive.

The CETME C is on the other end of the G3 type spectrum.  It's not actually G3 based, it was the precursor of the G3 series that was designed for the Spanish army.  The G3 battle rifle is an evolution of the CETME design, and they are so similar that some parts are directly interchangeable and many more with some minor alterations.  CETME parts kits are also still dirt cheap, just about the cheapest parts kits of any type on the market, and you know I'm a sucker for cheap things.  I got mine from APEX for a whopping $125.  Here's what I'm starting with.  The parts kit is in good shape, but is definitely used.

I'm not going to call this a PSG-1 clone because it definitely isn't.  This is going to be a low buck "stand back and squint and it sort of looks right" build.  I'm not looking for ultimate accuracy either, just a good shooter.  Since even PSG-1 parts are expensive, I'm probably not going to use any, hence the name PSG-None.   It will be a mix of CETME, G3, and 3D printed Jeff made parts.  

Mr. CETME is horrified with what's about to happen...